O
ONIOKO
OBSERVATIONAL PERCEPTION
Perception Report
REF · bc729b2e-222a-4e7f-8f24-df48d76a3df6 · Oct 18, 2026
Avatar Call

What was said, and whether it held together.

A single call, read on two layers: the answers gathered in conversation, and the signal congruence OPM observed while they were spoken.

JS
Juan Schubert ·
Dauer 2:00
Sprache EN
Signal Congruence

Hielt das Gesagte und das Gezeigte zusammen?

0%
Congruent
Verbal
Signal
Verbale Sicherheit (Wortwahl, Tempo)Signal-Evidenz (Mikroausdruck, Prosodie)Inkongruenz-Moment
◆No transcript provided; congruence assessment requires semantic content to compare against prosodic signals. Prosodic analysis only is insufficient for signal-verbal alignment scoring.
LUCID · Interpretation

Was das Gespräch erzählt

she

This call between Juan Schubert and Adrian Cole lacks a transcript or call summary, preventing substantive reconstruction of the conversation's context, topics, or decisions. Analysis is constrained to prosodic signal interpretation across eleven discrete frames spanning approximately 71 seconds of interaction.

MODELL · claude41 WÖRTER11 CHUNK · 2 GPU
CYGNUS · Signale

Was sichtbar war

it
High-variability vocal stress with extended pausing and pitch instability; no facial action data available
0%
52 BLENDSHAPES · 11 FRAMES @ 1FPS ·
ORACLE · Muster

Was zusammenhing

he
◇
Fragmented Speech EngagementFrames 2–6 show pause ratios 0.81–0.89 with extended silence (avg 3.8–5.5 sec), interrupted by low speech ratio (0.11–0.19). Suggests hesitation, cognitive load, or affective withdrawal.
78%
◇
Pitch Instability EscalationMean pitch ranges 99.8–142.2 Hz across frames; frame 6 peaks at 142.2 Hz with maximal tremor (1.53) and near-zero voice stability. Consistent with anxiety or emotional strain.
82%
◇
Volume Compression & RecoveryFrame 2 shows volume collapse (−82.12 dB, range 128 dB) with severe instability; frames 7–9 stabilize around −51 to −64 dB. Pattern suggests initial distress followed by partial vocal recovery.
75%
◇
Speaking Rate CollapseFrames 1, 10, 11 show zero speaking rate (static or non-verbal), while frames 2–6 hover at 0.7–4.3 WPS—far below typical conversational baseline (120–150 WPS). Indicates deliberate, labored articulation or long silences.
88%
Aus dem Gespräch

Was im Gespräch aufkam

0 Fragen
Transkript

Wortlaut

EN · vollständig
Termin

Vorgeschlagen